RemNetRemNetRemNetRemNet
  • HOME
  • ABOUT
    • About RemNet
    • Committee Members & Executive Management
    • People Analytics Forum
    • Member Companies
  • BENEFITS
  • EVENTS
    • Events List
    • Annual Conference
    • RemNet Connect
    • Special Interest Groups (SIGs)
  • SURVEYS
    • SPEEDBACK Surveys
    • Request a New Survey
    • Historical Surveys
  • RESOURCES
    • Service Providers
    • System Providers
    • Recommended Websites
    • RemNet Gender Tool
  • BLOG
  • CONTACT
  • JOIN

What about the ethnicity pay gap? Analysing beyond gender

    Home General HR What about the ethnicity pay gap? Analysing beyond gender

    What about the ethnicity pay gap? Analysing beyond gender

    By Salome Damle | General HR, Pay Equity | 0 comment | 23 January, 2020 | 8

    What about the ethnicity pay gap?  Analysing beyond gender

    A lot has been written about the gender pay gap, but a lot less is being said about analysing pay gaps linked to other D&I factors, such as age, disability and ethnicity.

    Some recent statistics from a joint study of pay equity practices conducted by World at Work and Korn Ferry caught my attention:

    ·         46% of organisations consider both gender and ethnicity in pay equity analyses.

    ·         36% of organisations take additional demographics (e.g., age) into account.

    No doubt like many of you, I’m curious about quality analysis of pay gap indicators beyond gender. Being able to report on ethnicity is closest to my heart as I’m doubly impacted by these biases in that I’m Indian and I’m female. A quick Google search doesn’t show me how this is (possibly) being achieved in NZ organisations.  Is reporting on ethnicity still sitting in the ‘too hard basket’?

    I asked our RemNet membership using a Speedback Survey with the following response from 14 companies:

    ·         Only 36% analyse pay gaps by factors other than gender

    ·         Surprisingly, only one organisation analyses ethnicity; and

    ·         Perhaps more alarmingly, only 21% of member organisations indicated that they’ll look at analysis by ethnicity in the future.

    We know there’s an ethnicity pay gap in NZ. A 2018 white paper from Statistics NZ: Statistical Analysis of Ethnic Wage Gaps in NZ, using data from the 2016 and 2017 Household Labour Force Surveys found significant ethnicity pay gaps. Statistics NZ estimate the average hourly wage earned by Māori employees as 82% of the average hourly Pākehā wage, and the average wage earned by Pacific employees at only 77% of the Pākehā average.

    We know Boards across NZ have set targets for achieving a gender balance and more diverse representation in terms of ethnicity in their leadership teams. It makes sense that pay parity across gender and ethnicity would also be expected in working towards these goals.

    So what’s holding us back from analysing ethnicity pay gaps within our organisations?

    The thought starters below are intended to start the ethnicity pay gap conversation within our network.  My hope is that collectively we’re able to identify solutions to the challenges we’re all facing.

    1.     Robust data is the biggest barrier to ethnicity pay gap reporting. This challenge has existed on a national level since well before we started thinking about pay gaps – even with something as important as our national census.

    NZ doesn’t have strict reporting guidelines like the UK or USA so our employees can choose not to report their ethnicity. Do we wait till NZ follows suit and implements stricter reporting rules? Or, can we work with our employees to raise awareness and help them understand why we need their data and what exactly it will be used for.

    Fonterra started this journey last year by conducting a ‘diversity census’ for our NZ-based employees, encouraging them to update all their personal details on our HR system. We then celebrated our diversity, communicating the results in an infographic.

    2.     How do we treat employees with mixed ethnicity? Do we only report on the most dominant ethnicity or on all ethnicities an employee identifies with?

    Statistics NZ introduced ‘Kiwi’ in our national census. ‘Kiwi Asian’ and ‘Kiwi Indian’ have become increasingly popular.  Are we confusing nationality with ethnicity?

    Are we at risk of giving more ‘weighting’ to one ethnicity over another in order to make our stats shine? For example, if an organisation has programs for Maori/Pasifika employees might they only include an employee’s Maori/Pasifika background and disregard any other ethnicity they have recorded?

    Is it appropriate to ask employees to ‘rank’ all the ethnicities they identify with?

    3.     Are we trying to be too specific?  Do we need to analyse pay gaps by all unique ethnicities, or should we group by continent?

    Perhaps we could turn to Statistics NZ for some best practice guidelines to kickstart our ethnicity pay gap analysis. Their “Ethnicity NZ Standard Classification 2005” is an attempt at standardising ethnicity classifications.

    4.     How do we manage gaps in our data where no ethnicity has been specified?  Do we report on ‘other’, or are we excluding this part of our employee population and pretending we have a full data set?

    5.     Should we analyse ethnicity on its own as we’ve been doing for gender? Will analysing the interaction of multiple D&I factors give us a more accurate picture or complicate our story?

    Research shows the impacts of both gender and diversity are more profound than gender alone.

     

    We’d love to hear from you.  Who’s already begun to tackle these challenges?  Where to from here?

    No tags.

    Leave a Comment

    Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    CAPTCHA
    Refresh

    *

    Recent News

    • Xero’s Rewards Optimisation Project August 4, 2022
    • A focus on Wellbeing and Mental Health September 28, 2021
    • Aftermath of Covid-19 for Remuneration and Benefits August 2, 2021

    Archives

    • August 2022
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • September 2020
    • July 2020
    • March 2020
    • January 2020
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • May 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • November 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • March 2018
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • April 2017
    • February 2017
    • November 2016
    • August 2016
    new-zealand-remuneration-network-footer-logo




    About Remnet
    Benefits of membership
    Events
    Join RemNet
    Sitemap

    Recent News

    • Xero’s Rewards Optimisation Project

      Xero’s largest cost is remuneration and reward and like most companies, Xero

      4 August, 2022
    • A focus on Wellbeing and Mental Health

      This week its Mental Health Awareness Week, and with the Auckland in

      28 September, 2021

    Contact Us

    Email: info@remnet.org.nz

    Address:
    PO Box 9525
    Newmarket
    Auckland 1149
    © New Zealand Remuneration Network 2023
    • HOME
    • ABOUT
      • About RemNet
      • Committee Members & Executive Management
      • People Analytics Forum
      • Member Companies
    • BENEFITS
    • EVENTS
      • Events List
      • Annual Conference
      • RemNet Connect
      • Special Interest Groups (SIGs)
    • SURVEYS
      • SPEEDBACK Surveys
      • Request a New Survey
      • Historical Surveys
    • RESOURCES
      • Service Providers
      • System Providers
      • Recommended Websites
      • RemNet Gender Tool
    • BLOG
    • CONTACT
    • JOIN
    RemNet